<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Article Authoring DTD v1.4 20240229//EN" "JATS-articleauthoring1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="zh-CN" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">12</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>国际医学</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title>International medicine</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn>ISSN：3104-4891（Print）（原2972-4163）</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>华文科学出版社（HUAWEN SCIENCE PRESS）</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12421/gjyx2023111009</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">415</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>静脉采血法、末梢采血法为患者进行血常规检验的效果对比</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>彭敏(山东省日照市人民医院)</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <year>2023</year>
        <month>11</month>
      </pub-date>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <abstract>
        <p>摘要:目的：对比静脉采血法与末梢采血法的血常规检验效果。方法：随机将 200 例接受血常规检验的患者分为对照组（100 例，采用末梢采血法）、观察组（100 例，采用静脉采血法），最后进行对比。结果：两组患者 PLT、RBC、Hb 等指标均有明显差异，呈 P0.05。结论：不同采集血液标本方式也会使检验结果存在一定差异，但相对来说静脉采血法准确性更高。</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
