<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Article Authoring DTD v1.4 20240229//EN" "JATS-articleauthoring1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="zh-CN" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">21</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>《教育教学研究》</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title>Education and Teaching Research</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn>ISSN:2737-4130：EISSN:2705-1277</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>环宇科学出版社</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12361/2705-1277-07-04-164335</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">14033</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>星云假说的双重命运与科学革命的隐形门槛</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>舒钰涵</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>何朝安 (东华大学人文学院 上海 200050)</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <year>2025</year>
        <month>4</month>
      </pub-date>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <abstract>
        <p>康德的星云假说发表以来遭遇了四十年的冷遇，即便后来进入大众视野也多侧重于哲学讨论而疏于科学思考；经过漫长历程才终于得到科学地位的承认。而拉普拉斯的星云假说甫一发表便掀起了广泛研究，反响热烈。这不仅揭示了科学革命中合法化延迟的现象，也给我们带来了更多思考：科学合法性的标准是什么？学术权威和社会语境</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
